Lucky Saint vs Heineken 0.0: Which Alcohol-Free Lager Wins?
Published May 2026 · 6-minute read · by Rich, founder of Unhopped
These are the two alcohol-free lagers you're most likely to be offered in a UK pub right now. Both have broad supermarket distribution. Both are recognisable on a beer menu. But they're very different beers, with different ABVs, different brewing approaches, and different ideas about what an alcohol-free lager should taste like.
The basic distinction
Lucky Saint is a UK alcohol-free brand founded in 2018 by Luke Boase. Their flagship Unfiltered Lager is brewed in Bavaria using a single-fermentation process that prevents alcohol forming above 0.5% ABV in the first place — rather than removing it from a finished full-strength beer.
Heineken 0.0 is the alcohol-free expression of the world's most-recognised lager brand, launched globally in 2017. It's brewed at full strength using Heineken's proprietary A-yeast, then the alcohol is removed via vacuum distillation — a low-temperature process designed to preserve the original flavour. Heineken 0.0 is a true 0.0% (technically below 0.05% ABV).
| Lucky Saint Unfiltered Lager | Heineken 0.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| ABV | 0.5% | 0.0% (max 0.03%) |
| Calories per 330ml | 53 kcal | ~69 kcal (21 kcal/100ml) |
| Brewing process | Single fermentation, alcohol never forms | Full brew, then vacuum distillation |
| Brewery location | Bavaria, Germany | Multiple Heineken sites globally |
| Filtration | Unfiltered (hazy) | Filtered (clear) |
| Vegan | Yes | Yes |
| Gluten-free | No (Pilsner malt) | No (barley malt) |
| UK supermarkets | Tesco, Sainsbury's, Waitrose, Ocado, Morrisons | All major supermarkets, off-licences |
| UK draught | Lucky Saint pub Marylebone, growing pub list | Most pubs that serve AF on draught |
| Price (4-pack 330ml) | ~£6 typical (Tesco £4.75 with Clubcard) | ~£4-5 typical |
How they actually taste
Lucky Saint — fuller, breadier, characterful
Lucky Saint pours hazy pale gold with a steady white head. The unfiltered character is visible — a soft cloudiness rather than the bright clarity of a typical pilsner. Aroma is bread-crust malt, a touch of honey, a faint herbal-floral noble hop note in the background. It's clean — no wort-like or honey-syrup aromas that give away weaker AF lagers.
On the palate, Lucky Saint is full-bodied for a 0.5% beer. Bready malt up front, moderate bitterness through the middle, finishing dry with a subtle hop-derived spice. The mouthfeel is genuinely satisfying rather than thin or watery, which is the failure mode for most alcohol-free lagers. This is Bavarian Kellerbier territory — closer to a German village pub pint than to mass-market lager.
Heineken 0.0 — lighter, crisper, mainstream
Heineken 0.0 pours pale straw, brilliantly clear, with a quick-dropping white head. Aroma is light malt with a grain-husk character — recognisably Heineken in profile, just less intense than the full-strength version.
On the palate, Heineken 0.0 is light-bodied with gentle malt sweetness up front, mild hop bitterness in the middle, and a clean short finish. Body is the giveaway — Heineken 0.0 is thinner than the full-strength version because much of the body in regular Heineken comes from alcohol itself. Drink it well-chilled; warmer than fridge-cold, the gap to full-strength becomes more obvious.
0.0% vs 0.5% — does it matter?
This is the most common practical question. Heineken 0.0 contains essentially no alcohol; Lucky Saint contains 0.5% ABV. For most drinkers, the difference is academic — both are within the UK "alcohol-free" labelling threshold, both are safe to drive after, and both contain less alcohol than naturally occurs in things like ripe bananas or fresh orange juice.
But there are situations where 0.0% genuinely matters: pregnancy, recovery from alcohol dependence, certain medications, and religious observance. If any of those apply, Heineken 0.0 is the right choice. For more context on what these labels mean, see our 0.0% vs 0.5% explainer.
Calories — Heineken 0.0 wins on paper
Heineken 0.0 is roughly 21 kcal per 100ml, working out at around 69 kcal per 330ml bottle. Lucky Saint is 53 kcal per 330ml — about 23% lower than Heineken 0.0 on absolute calories per bottle, despite Lucky Saint having a fuller body.
Wait — Lucky Saint is fuller-bodied AND lower-calorie? That doesn't sound right. The maths works because Heineken 0.0 has more residual fermentable carbohydrate left over after alcohol removal, while Lucky Saint's fuller mouthfeel comes from unfiltered yeast and protein rather than residual sugars. For specific comparisons across more beers, run the numbers in our calorie calculator.
Where each one wins
How they compare against the wider AF lager category
Lucky Saint sits at the top of the UK AF lager rankings — comfortably ahead of supermarket own-brand AF lagers, and in regular conversation with the highest-rated craft AF beers. Lucky Saint won the Which? 2025 blind taste test.
Heineken 0.0 is the world's most-distributed AF beer, but in pure flavour terms it sits in the middle of the category — better than budget supermarket options, behind dedicated craft AF brands. Its genuine advantage is availability, not flavour expression. For a fuller picture, see our alcohol-free lager hub.
Beers to explore
If this comparison helps, here are the two beers featured plus a couple more to consider in the same category:

